The
Cautioner’s Tale was not a comic book like I was expecting, but a
simulation of a journal, with a strong nod to the Victorian epistolary
tradition. Something about all the
toxins and metal pieces reminded me of some sort of steam punk reality, and there
are many letters, something you would find in many Victorian novels since
letter writing was the texting of the day.
It’s not consistent in its form as a journal or diary, along side the
newspaper clippings and bits of paper are bottles, signs, and large boxes,
gracing the page as if they could be tucked into the physical book along with
the paper pages. If it was important
enough, it found its way on the page. I
suppose this makes it less of a journal, but it did fill it with more of the
things the main character is seeing and investigating.
I
found the world building of this story interesting, it draws strong parallels
to our world and references very clearly certain current events, but it is
still a bit different from our world.
The references to food quality hit me the most. A restaurant with “poison” in the name and
fish in a river that no one in their right mind would eat. I think this made the world the most real for
me, the very low qualities of food and living standards expected from the world
and institutions around the characters is sad.
Other devices are a bit heavy handed, like the voting ballot with only
one option on it, or the names of the characters that are evil, they’re always
full of undesirable words. But despite
never getting much of a full description of the world, I did feel very grounded
in it. Maybe there are a lot of
dystopias being made right now, but it felt vivid and real to me.
The
visual style gave us documents and images to examine and get the feel of what
the character is collecting and experiencing, but it lacks the visual depth and
complexity of a comic book. The buttons
come up very soon and are fairly obvious.
The clues are explained as she receives them, there isn’t much mystery
to them. In looking at the text you can
see if it’s supposed to be from a newspaper, a receipt, an official letter, or
a scrap of a note added in later. This
gives us knowledge about what’s private and public knowledge, also how risky
the information is or what its physically been through to get to the main character,
but it doesn’t provide visual poetry or the ability to let our eyes wander and
discover new things about the story.
Since
the entries are written after the main character has already experienced
something dangerous or enlightening, the entries feel more like summaries of
the past. We are removed from the action
and told what happened by the character, leaving the power of the events a bit
flat. It felt less emotional, I was
never anxious that the main character might not make it or had met their match,
since almost every entry ends with them resolving the issue they brought up at
the beginning. It’s difficult to keep
tension in this format, everything feels like it’s already over and decided,
and since the main character is bringing everything to us, we just wait for the
next bit of information. It felt like
the character explained what they were trying to figure out and then the clues
just appeared, “…I did not expect such blatant confirmation of my path forward
as what I received from reading the scholar’s words.” (Wilburn).
I felt this happened a lot.
Clues, hints, and new leads appearing whenever the story needed them
to. Most of the entries didn’t resemble
scenes, and so I did get tired of the same kind of set up to move the plot
along. How she solves the clues is
usually remembering an old code she developed years before, so her cleverness
or her ability to solve a problem or clue is lost on us. There’s little creativity or interesting
thought that goes into solving the problems presented, making each discovery
seem easy.
-Iris
Hi Iris,
ReplyDeleteI appreciate the way you discussed the lack of tension in the book. I also felt this while reading. After reading your post, I questioned why I engaged with the book in that way. For me, the names were a stumbling block. The characters felt more like caricatures. The book also engaged in such clear and obvious politics. And I agree with you that the events are so easily solved that there really is no question of whether Mary Morgan will win the day. Obviously, the writer made some of these choices for a reason. I wonder if the choice to privilege a political message got in the way of whether the story was captivating to readers. Perhaps, as a craft lesson, this might help us attempt to allow any political messages to serve the story and not allow the story to become a prop for relating our political opinions.
Agreed.
ReplyDeleteI wonder about the "clear and obvious politics" bit. They weren't that clear to me, other than the obvious "Trump = bad." No meaningful alternative or conceivable course of action is offered. I think I despised its politics more so because it's cowardly while thinking of itself as dissenting.
I'm glad you discussed world-building in this because, as I was reading the book, I was thinking about your work and about how much more creative and detailed world-building fantasy and sci-fi writers need to do. But I do agree that Wilburn failed to build tension in the hand-fed revelations especially toward the end.
ReplyDelete