Laurie Frankel’s This
Is How It Always Is, has a strong
fairy tale association both within the story and in its narration. The concept
of transformation is a popular theme in fairy tales—a girl becoming a princess,
princes becoming animals—that is fit into Poppy’s story of her transformation.
Penn compares it as such explaining, “virtue leads straight to transformation;
transformation leads instantly to happily ever after” (page 159). His view of
transformation is about bring to the outside what is already on the inside, not
as an ideal self but as the true self. In the case with Poppy, it is about
bring her self, Poppy, out from Claude. The novel follows a loose fairy tale
structure as well, from the kind but childless husband and wife, conflict that
requires advice from a knowledgeable, “magical,” individual, transformation,
and happily ever after. Rosie and Penn are presented as the kind couple that
want kids, Rosie asking for a daughter every pregnancy—in fairy tales it is a
mother or queen that asks for a child, like in Snow White, or Rapunzel. Once
they have their children they are unsure how to properly support Claude/Poppy
and thus Mr. Tongo for advice—the wise friend that seems to hold the answers.
He is even described as a “multi degree social-working therapist-magician”
(page 66). Then there are the transformations, mainly with Claude becoming
Poppy, reverting to Claude, and then reaching her true self and thus reaches
the happy ending.
There are multiple times
throughout the novel where the line, “once upon a time” come up. It is in the title
of the first chapter that introduces Claude and the events that lead up to
birth. It comes up again during the creation of the Grumwald bedtime
story, which serves as a mirror to the Walsh-Adams children. Frankel
intentionally makes the parallel to fairy tales in order to add her own spin on
it. When this line does appear in the first chapter it’s, “Once upon a time,
Dr. Rosalind Walsh and her husband had had sex that started spontaneously and
uncontrollably…” (page 4). Frankel includes Rosie’s name—and title as
Doctor—and excludes Penn’s, referring to him as “her husband.” It contrasts
against the typical fairy tale beginning where the King is mention and the
Queen is usually “his wife.” These stories existing inside the family’s story
at times take over the narrative. Aside from Grumwald’s, Claude’s recounting of
Stephanie’s tale escapes Claude’s narrative by existing outside of Claude’s
quotations. Similarly, Rosie’s Jane Doe story is also told outside of her mind
and quotes. This small narrative takes up almost four pages, treating Jane Doe
and Chad as their own characters with their own insights. Frankel’s narrative
switching was interesting to read, bringing back to mind the quote from early
in the novel, “That’s what all stories want. They want to get out, get told,
get heard. Otherwise, what’s the point of stories?” (page 29). There are
multiple stories in This Is How It
Always Is as the perspective does
not stick to one character
Frankel tells the story
of Poppy and her family as a fairy tale while at the same time dissecting them
and yet falling into the structure. The family read as the ideal family,
described at one point by Mr. Tongo as too supportive. Claude/Poppy was the
virtuous main character pulled into negative circumstances that, as a child,
does not have a lot of control over. I expected a happy ending early on, just
like a fairy tale. However, the magic is not the cure to all nor a painless and
instant form of transformation. Poppy needed to overcome obstacles. I was also
interested in the question Frankel raised in the Author’s Note. Because the
novel was so intertwined with magic and storytelling, just how close—or not—is
it to fiction? With the similarities to Frankel’s life, just how “fiction” is
her fiction novel? Fairy tales, no matter how magical they are, have an aspect
to them that relates to reality, thus allowing them continued existence. Maybe
Frankel wanted to capture an experience or an emotion and keep it in the form of
a story where the reality and the magical blend.
Great take Joana—and great parallels. When reading interviews with Frankel, i noted some readers thought the ending was ambiguous. Is that coming from a frozen binary reader? Or the fairy tale set up that didn’t allow for happily ever after? At one point a character says, the ending might not be happy but the middle can be? Is it? I love your parallel and how Penn keeps Grunwald as a deliberate parallel to his family b/c he can’t control it—not even his DN till he puts his energies where they need to be.
ReplyDeleteE
I love that you brought up the fairy tale structure and devices used in the book and how that helps to create the multiple stories occurring throughout the novel. I'm also especially interested in the idea of happy middles as someone else (I don't remember who, I'm so sorry) brought up and how that, like Grumwald's story, was allowed to have an end while Poppy's story doesn't really, truly end - this being just one possible ending, one ending for now, a middle. In that way, I'm curious about the intentions of the novel which Jamie and a few others mentioned along with Marissa's point of how the story was intended vs how it has been received. Here, I'll just pose my question to the intention mainly - do you think that by using this structure and having an "end" that's not really an end but a middle, opens up for conversation about how this is really an ideal situation? One in which Poppy is loved and whose parents chose the path where they wouldn't see her continuing to shrink in her drawings until she could no longer be found in her family portraits? One where she realizes that she will always have a safe place at home where people love her no matter what? A lot of this is coming from some of what Elmaz mentioned in comments about how groups are represented by publishers (i.e. the story of a gender non-conforming child being told by the parent of the child rather than from the child's perspective) - is one of the author's intentions to get this story published so that others who are gender non-conforming can tell this story from the child's perspective in the future? Is this meant to be a diving board or a launching pad from which the stories of these individuals can finally tell their own stories and for it to reach that wider audience who will finally listen and hear them?
ReplyDeleteI didn't really notice all the times the story was similar to a fairy tale, outside of Poppy's more individual story. The connection between the childless couple archetype and the daughterless couple in the book makes a lot of sense and I found myself looking back in my memory for more parallels I missed.
ReplyDelete